digesting: has quality change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality change 1.00
has quality bad 0.86
is chemical change 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(digesting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(digesting, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(digesting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(digesting, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(digesting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(digesting, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(digesting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(digesting, is chemical change)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(digesting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(digesting, is chemical change)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(digesting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(digesting, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(digesting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(digesting, is chemical change)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(digesting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(digesting, is chemical change)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(digesting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(digesting, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(digesting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(digesting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(digesting, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(digesting, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(digesting, has quality change)