digestion: differ in single animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.67
, function
Weight: 0.64
, autonomic nervous system
Weight: 0.60
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.59
Siblings metabolism
Weight: 0.36
, fermentation
Weight: 0.36
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.35
, hydrolysis
Weight: 0.35
, cellular respiration
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ in single animals 1.00
be important for animals 0.79
be different compared to more complex animals 0.79
be necessary for animals 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be important for animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(photosynthesis, be important for animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(photosynthesis, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(photosynthesis, be important for animals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be important for animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(digestion, differ in single animals)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(digestion, be necessary for animals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(digestion, be necessary for animals)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be necessary for animals)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(digestion, be necessary for animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(digestion, differ in single animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(digestion, differ in single animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(photosynthesis, be important for animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(digestion, differ in single animals)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be important for animals)