digestive system: has quality definition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organ
Weight: 0.64
, human body
Weight: 0.62
, tissue
Weight: 0.60
, bacterium
Weight: 0.59
, symptom
Weight: 0.55
Siblings large intestine
Weight: 0.64
, esophagus
Weight: 0.60
, flatulence
Weight: 0.57
, gastritis
Weight: 0.57
, circulatory system
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality definition 1.00
has quality system 0.77
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(bacterium, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(bacterium, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(bacterium, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(bacterium, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(digestive system, has quality definition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(digestive system, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(digestive system, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(digestive system, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(digestive system, has quality system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(digestive system, has quality system)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, has quality system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bacterium, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(digestive system, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bacterium, has quality bad)