digestive system: is more efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organ
Weight: 0.64
, human body
Weight: 0.62
, tissue
Weight: 0.60
, bacterium
Weight: 0.59
, symptom
Weight: 0.55
Siblings large intestine
Weight: 0.64
, esophagus
Weight: 0.60
, flatulence
Weight: 0.57
, gastritis
Weight: 0.57
, circulatory system
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more efficient 1.00
is efficient 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, is more efficient)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, is efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(circulatory system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, is more efficient)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(circulatory system, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, is efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(digestive system, is more efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(digestive system, is efficient)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(digestive system, is efficient)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(digestive system, is efficient)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, is efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, is more efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(digestive system, is more efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(circulatory system, is more efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(circulatory system, is efficient)