digital camera: be better than film

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.76
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.73
, photograph
Weight: 0.73
, camera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.73
, computer
Weight: 0.71
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.64
, scanner
Weight: 0.63
, video
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than film 1.00
be better than film cameras 0.89
be more efficient than film cameras 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(camera, be better than film)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(camera, be better than film cameras)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film cameras)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(digital camera, be better than film)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(camera, be better than film)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(camera, be better than film cameras)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(camera, be better than film)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(digital camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(camera, be better than film cameras)