digital camera: be better than film cameras

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.76
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.73
, photograph
Weight: 0.73
, camera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.73
, computer
Weight: 0.71
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.64
, scanner
Weight: 0.63
, video
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than film cameras 1.00
be more efficient than film cameras 0.95
be different from cameras 0.90
be better than film 0.89
be different from traditional cameras 0.84
store images in camera 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(camera, be different from traditional cameras)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(camera, be better than film)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(camera, be better than film cameras)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(camera, be different from traditional cameras)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film cameras)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(camera, be different from traditional cameras)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(camera, be better than film)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(camera, be different from traditional cameras)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be different from cameras)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(digital camera, be different from cameras)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(digital camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(digital camera, be better than film)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(digital camera, be different from cameras)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be different from traditional cameras)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(digital camera, be different from traditional cameras)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(digital camera, store images in camera)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(digital camera, be different from traditional cameras)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be different from cameras)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be different from traditional cameras)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(digital camera, store images in camera)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(digital camera, store images in camera)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, store images in camera)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(camera, be better than film cameras)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(camera, be better than film)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(camera, store images in camera)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(camera, be different from traditional cameras)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(camera, store images in camera)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(camera, be more efficient than film cameras)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(camera, be better than film)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(camera, be better than film cameras)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(camera, be different from traditional cameras)