digital camera: be input device

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.76
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.73
, photograph
Weight: 0.73
, camera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.73
, computer
Weight: 0.71
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.64
, scanner
Weight: 0.63
, video
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be input device 1.00
is input device 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(digital camera, be input device)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(camera, is input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(digital camera, be input device)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(camera, be input device)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(camera, is input device)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(camera, be input device)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(camera, is input device)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(scanner, is input device)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be input device)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(camera, is input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be input device)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(scanner, is input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(scanner, is input device)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(digital camera, be input device)

Similarity expansion

0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(digital camera, is input device)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is input device)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is input device)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(digital camera, is input device)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be input device)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(digital camera, be input device)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(camera, is input device)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(camera, be input device)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(scanner, is input device)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(camera, is input device)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(digital camera, be input device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(camera, be input device)