digital camera: be terrible focusing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.76
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.73
, photograph
Weight: 0.73
, camera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.73
, computer
Weight: 0.71
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.64
, scanner
Weight: 0.63
, video
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be terrible focusing 1.00
know in focus 0.85
know in when focus 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(digital camera, be terrible focusing)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(digital camera, know in when focus)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(digital camera, know in when focus)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(digital camera, know in focus)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, know in when focus)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(digital camera, know in focus)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(digital camera, know in focus)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(digital camera, know in when focus)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, know in focus)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be terrible focusing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(digital camera, be terrible focusing)