digital camera: have sound

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.76
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.73
, photograph
Weight: 0.73
, camera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.73
, computer
Weight: 0.71
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.64
, scanner
Weight: 0.63
, video
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
have sound 1.00
make sound 0.95
have noise 0.78
make noise 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(camera, make noise)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(digital camera, have sound)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(camera, make noise)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(camera, make noise)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(camera, make noise)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(digital camera, have sound)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(digital camera, have sound)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(digital camera, make sound)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(digital camera, make sound)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(digital camera, have noise)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(digital camera, make noise)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(digital camera, make sound)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(digital camera, make noise)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(digital camera, have noise)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(digital camera, make noise)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, make sound)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, make noise)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(digital camera, have noise)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, have noise)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, have sound)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(digital camera, have sound)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(camera, make noise)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(digital camera, have sound)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(camera, make noise)