digital camera: know in when focus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.76
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.73
, photograph
Weight: 0.73
, camera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.73
, computer
Weight: 0.71
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.64
, scanner
Weight: 0.63
, video
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
know in when focus 1.00
know in focus 0.97
be terrible focusing 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, know in when focus)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(digital camera, know in when focus)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, know in when focus)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(digital camera, know in focus)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(digital camera, know in when focus)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(digital camera, know in focus)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(digital camera, know in when focus)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(digital camera, know in focus)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(digital camera, know in when focus)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, know in when focus)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(digital camera, know in when focus)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(digital camera, know in when focus)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, know in focus)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(digital camera, know in when focus)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(digital camera, be terrible focusing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(digital camera, know in when focus)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(digital camera, know in when focus)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, know in when focus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, know in when focus)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(digital camera, know in when focus)