digitalis: has quality effect

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.37
Siblings aloe vera
Weight: 0.29
, valerian
Weight: 0.29
, chrysanthemum
Weight: 0.29
, horsetail
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality effect 1.00
has quality effects 0.88
is side effects 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(digitalis, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(digitalis, has quality effect)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(digitalis, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(digitalis, has quality effects)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(digitalis, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(digitalis, has quality effects)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(digitalis, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(digitalis, is side effects)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(digitalis, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(digitalis, has quality effects)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(digitalis, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(digitalis, is side effects)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(digitalis, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(digitalis, has quality effects)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(digitalis, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(digitalis, is side effects)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(digitalis, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(digitalis, is side effects)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(digitalis, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(digitalis, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(digitalis, has quality effect)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(digitalis, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(digitalis, has quality effect)