dim sum: be called dim sum

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.63
, dish
Weight: 0.62
, chinese food
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.56
, food
Weight: 0.56
Siblings congee
Weight: 0.39
, sum
Weight: 0.35
, dark matter
Weight: 0.34
, living thing
Weight: 0.32
, picture frame
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called dim sum 1.00
be called sum 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sum, be called dim sum)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sum, be called sum)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(dim sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(sum, be called sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sum, be called sum)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(dim sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sum, be called dim sum)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(dim sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(dim sum, be called dim sum)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(dim sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, be called sum)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(dim sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dim sum, be called sum)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(dim sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(dim sum, be called sum)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(dim sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(dim sum, be called sum)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(dim sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(dim sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, be called dim sum)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(dim sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(dim sum, be called dim sum)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sum, be called sum)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, be called dim sum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sum, be called dim sum)