dingo: has state pests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.49
, puppy
Weight: 0.48
, species
Weight: 0.46
, wolf
Weight: 0.46
Siblings cougar
Weight: 0.37
, coyote
Weight: 0.36
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.36
, wallaby
Weight: 0.36
, saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pests 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dingo, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wallaby, has state pests)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(dingo, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wallaby, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wallaby, has state pests)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(dingo, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(dingo, has state pests)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(dingo, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(dingo, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dingo, has state pests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(dingo, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(dingo, has state pests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dingo, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wallaby, has state pests)