dining table: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	dining room Weight: 0.76 , table Weight: 0.74 , living room Weight: 0.67 , place Weight: 0.66 , furniture Weight: 0.63
Siblings	coffee table Weight: 0.78 , fireplace Weight: 0.59 , armchair Weight: 0.44 , picnic table Weight: 0.41 , hash table Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00
is cheap	0.79
be expensive in uk	0.78
is inefficient	0.76
be expensive in usa	0.76
be expensive in canada	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(furniture, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(dining table, is expensive)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(furniture, is cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(dining table, is expensive)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(furniture, be expensive in uk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(dining table, is expensive)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(furniture, be expensive in usa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(dining table, is expensive)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(furniture, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(dining table, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(furniture, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(furniture, is cheap)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(furniture, be expensive in uk)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(furniture, be expensive in canada)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(furniture, be expensive in usa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(furniture, be expensive in canada)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(furniture, is expensive)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(furniture, be expensive in uk)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(furniture, is cheap)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(furniture, be expensive in usa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(coffee table, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(fireplace, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(fireplace, is inefficient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(furniture, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(dining table, is expensive)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(furniture, is cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(dining table, is expensive)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(furniture, be expensive in uk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(dining table, is expensive)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(furniture, be expensive in usa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(dining table, is expensive)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(furniture, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(dining table, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(armchair, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(fireplace, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(fireplace, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(coffee table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(coffee table, is expensive)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(fireplace, is inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(fireplace, is inefficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(dining table, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(dining table, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(furniture, be expensive in canada)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(furniture, is expensive)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(furniture, be expensive in usa)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(furniture, be expensive in uk)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(furniture, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(fireplace, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(armchair, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(fireplace, is inefficient)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(coffee table, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(furniture, is expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(furniture, is cheap)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(furniture, be expensive in uk)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(furniture, be expensive in usa)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(dining table, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(furniture, be expensive in canada)