dinner plate: be at table

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents piece
Weight: 0.61
, fish
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.52
, pattern
Weight: 0.49
Siblings dinner
Weight: 0.36
, plate
Weight: 0.35
, picnic table
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.34
, steak
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at table 1.00
be at on table 0.98
be at your table 0.94
be used to set table 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be at table)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plate, be at on table)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steak, be at your table)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(plate, be used to set table)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plate, be at on table)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(plate, be at on table)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(steak, be at your table)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(steak, be at your table)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dinner, be at table)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(dinner, be at table)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(plate, be used to set table)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(plate, be used to set table)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(dinner plate, be at table)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dinner plate, be at table)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(dinner plate, be at table)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(dinner, be at table)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(plate, be at on table)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(plate, be used to set table)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dinner plate, be at table)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(steak, be at your table)