dinner: be more expensive than lunch

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.64
, meal
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings thanksgiving
Weight: 0.63
, lunch
Weight: 0.63
, reception
Weight: 0.61
, brunch
Weight: 0.57
, breakfast
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than lunch 1.00
is lunch 0.89
be better than breakfast 0.85
be important meal of day 0.83
is most important meal 0.82
is important meal 0.80
be most substantial meal of day 0.80
is meal 0.79
is best meal 0.79
have expensive 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, be important meal of day)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, is most important meal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, is important meal)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be important meal of day)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is important meal)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, is meal)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is meal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(lunch, is meal)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lunch, is meal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(breakfast, is meal)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(breakfast, is meal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(lunch, be important meal of day)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(lunch, be important meal of day)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(lunch, is important meal)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lunch, is important meal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(breakfast, is most important meal)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(breakfast, is most important meal)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(breakfast, is important meal)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(breakfast, is important meal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(breakfast, be important meal of day)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(breakfast, be important meal of day)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dinner, is lunch)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(dinner, is lunch)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(dinner, is lunch)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(dinner, is meal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(dinner, be better than breakfast)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(dinner, is meal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be better than breakfast)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dinner, be better than breakfast)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(dinner, is meal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dinner, be better than breakfast)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be important meal of day)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is lunch)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is most important meal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is important meal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is best meal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(dinner, be important meal of day)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be most substantial meal of day)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dinner, have expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(dinner, be most substantial meal of day)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(dinner, is most important meal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(dinner, is important meal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(dinner, is best meal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(dinner, have expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is meal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(dinner, be most substantial meal of day)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dinner, be most substantial meal of day)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dinner, be important meal of day)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(dinner, is important meal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dinner, be important meal of day)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dinner, have expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(dinner, is most important meal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(dinner, is important meal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(dinner, is best meal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dinner, have expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dinner, is most important meal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dinner, is best meal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(lunch, is meal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(breakfast, is meal)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lunch, be important meal of day)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lunch, is important meal)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(breakfast, be important meal of day)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(breakfast, is important meal)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(breakfast, is most important meal)