dinner: fail in death

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.64
, meal
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings thanksgiving
Weight: 0.63
, lunch
Weight: 0.63
, reception
Weight: 0.61
, brunch
Weight: 0.57
, breakfast
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail in death 1.00
fail in death of salesman 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(dinner, fail in death)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(dinner, fail in death)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(dinner, fail in death)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(dinner, fail in death of salesman)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(dinner, fail in death)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(dinner, fail in death of salesman)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(dinner, fail in death)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(dinner, fail in death of salesman)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(dinner, fail in death)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(dinner, fail in death of salesman)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(dinner, fail in death)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(dinner, fail in death)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dinner, fail in death)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(dinner, fail in death)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(dinner, fail in death)