dinosaur: be closely related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.72
, creature
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, reptile
Weight: 0.60
Siblings tyrannosaurus
Weight: 0.78
, raptor
Weight: 0.67
, fossil
Weight: 0.57
, lizard
Weight: 0.38
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be closely related 1.00
be related 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(species, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be closely related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(species, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(species, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(fossil, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(species, be related)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, be closely related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(fossil, be related)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(fossil, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(dinosaur, be closely related)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(dinosaur, be related)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be related)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, be related)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be closely related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be closely related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(species, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fossil, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(dinosaur, be closely related)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(species, be related)