dinosaur: be named prehistoric reptiles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.72
, creature
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, reptile
Weight: 0.60
Siblings tyrannosaurus
Weight: 0.78
, raptor
Weight: 0.67
, fossil
Weight: 0.57
, lizard
Weight: 0.38
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be named prehistoric reptiles 1.00
be named reptiles 0.92
is reptiles 0.89
be considered reptiles 0.89
be classified as reptiles 0.85
be sized mammals reptiles nonexistent 0.84
be belong reptile 0.83
be called lizards 0.82
is lizards 0.82
be related to lizards 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(reptile, is reptiles)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(reptile, is reptiles)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(reptile, is reptiles)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(raptor, is reptiles)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(lizard, is reptiles)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(reptile, is reptiles)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(raptor, is reptiles)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(raptor, is reptiles)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(lizard, is reptiles)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lizard, is reptiles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(dinosaur, be considered reptiles)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be considered reptiles)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, be considered reptiles)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be belong reptile)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(dinosaur, be belong reptile)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(dinosaur, be related to lizards)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, be belong reptile)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be related to lizards)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, be related to lizards)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be considered reptiles)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be related to lizards)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be belong reptile)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(reptile, is reptiles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(raptor, is reptiles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(lizard, is reptiles)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(reptile, is reptiles)