dip: be expensive in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents recipe
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, exercise
Weight: 0.57
, dish
Weight: 0.55
Siblings drop
Weight: 0.34
, jump
Weight: 0.32
, bump
Weight: 0.32
, slide
Weight: 0.32
, flip flop
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in canada 1.00
be illegal in australia 0.81
be expensive in florida 0.80
be cheaper than cigs in usa 0.78
be illegal in europe 0.76
is expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dip, be expensive in canada)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dip, be expensive in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(dip, be expensive in canada)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(dip, be expensive in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(dip, be expensive in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dip, be illegal in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dip, be expensive in florida)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(dip, be illegal in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dip, be cheaper than cigs in usa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(dip, be illegal in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dip, be illegal in europe)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dip, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(dip, be expensive in florida)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(dip, be cheaper than cigs in usa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dip, be expensive in florida)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(dip, be cheaper than cigs in usa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(dip, be illegal in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(dip, be illegal in europe)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dip, be illegal in europe)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(dip, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dip, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(dip, be cheaper than cigs in usa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(dip, be expensive in florida)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dip, be illegal in europe)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(dip, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(dip, be expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dip, be expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(dip, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)