dip: burn like hell

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents recipe
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, exercise
Weight: 0.57
, dish
Weight: 0.55
Siblings drop
Weight: 0.34
, jump
Weight: 0.32
, bump
Weight: 0.32
, slide
Weight: 0.32
, flip flop
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
burn like hell 1.00
burn bad 0.86
burn 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(thing, burn)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dip, burn like hell)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(thing, burn)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(thing, burn)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(thing, burn)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(dip, burn like hell)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(dip, burn like hell)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(dip, burn bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(dip, burn bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(dip, burn bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(dip, burn)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(dip, burn)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(dip, burn)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(dip, burn bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dip, burn)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dip, burn like hell)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dip, burn like hell)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(thing, burn)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(dip, burn like hell)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(thing, burn)