diplomat: enjoy immunity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents public servant
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.57
, official
Weight: 0.56
, journalist
Weight: 0.55
, figure
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ambassador
Weight: 0.61
, politician
Weight: 0.33
, soldier
Weight: 0.33
, policeman
Weight: 0.33
, observer
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
enjoy immunity 1.00
get immunity 0.96
have immunity 0.96
need immunity 0.96
be given immunity 0.95
needs immunity 0.92
have diplomatic immunity 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ambassador, get immunity)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(politician, have immunity)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ambassador, have immunity)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ambassador, have diplomatic immunity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ambassador, have immunity)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ambassador, have immunity)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(politician, have immunity)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(politician, have immunity)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(ambassador, get immunity)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(ambassador, get immunity)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ambassador, have diplomatic immunity)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(ambassador, have diplomatic immunity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(diplomat, enjoy immunity)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, get immunity)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(diplomat, get immunity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(diplomat, get immunity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, be given immunity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(diplomat, need immunity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(diplomat, have immunity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(diplomat, be given immunity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(diplomat, be given immunity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(diplomat, needs immunity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(diplomat, need immunity)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(diplomat, need immunity)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(diplomat, have diplomatic immunity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(diplomat, needs immunity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, need immunity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, have immunity)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(diplomat, have diplomatic immunity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(diplomat, needs immunity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(diplomat, have immunity)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(diplomat, have diplomatic immunity)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(diplomat, get immunity)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(diplomat, be given immunity)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(diplomat, have immunity)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, have diplomatic immunity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(diplomat, enjoy immunity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ambassador, have immunity)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ambassador, get immunity)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ambassador, have diplomatic immunity)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(politician, have immunity)