diplomat: needs immunity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents public servant
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.57
, official
Weight: 0.56
, journalist
Weight: 0.55
, figure
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ambassador
Weight: 0.61
, politician
Weight: 0.33
, soldier
Weight: 0.33
, policeman
Weight: 0.33
, observer
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
needs immunity 1.00
need immunity 0.97
get immunity 0.95
have immunity 0.94
be given immunity 0.93
enjoy immunity 0.92
have diplomatic immunity 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ambassador, get immunity)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(politician, have immunity)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ambassador, have immunity)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ambassador, have diplomatic immunity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ambassador, have immunity)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ambassador, have immunity)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(politician, have immunity)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(politician, have immunity)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(ambassador, get immunity)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(ambassador, get immunity)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ambassador, have diplomatic immunity)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(ambassador, have diplomatic immunity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(diplomat, needs immunity)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, get immunity)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(diplomat, get immunity)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, be given immunity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, need immunity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(diplomat, need immunity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(diplomat, be given immunity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, have immunity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(diplomat, need immunity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(diplomat, need immunity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(diplomat, get immunity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(diplomat, have diplomatic immunity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(diplomat, be given immunity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(diplomat, have immunity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(diplomat, have immunity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(diplomat, have diplomatic immunity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(diplomat, have diplomatic immunity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(diplomat, enjoy immunity)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(diplomat, get immunity)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, have diplomatic immunity)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(diplomat, be given immunity)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(diplomat, have immunity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(diplomat, needs immunity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ambassador, have immunity)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ambassador, have diplomatic immunity)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ambassador, get immunity)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diplomat, needs immunity)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(politician, have immunity)