director: be important to film industry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents executive
Weight: 0.77
, officer
Weight: 0.69
, supervisor
Weight: 0.69
, police officer
Weight: 0.67
Siblings president
Weight: 0.69
, secretary
Weight: 0.67
, producer
Weight: 0.63
, lee
Weight: 0.54
, harold pinter
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to film industry 1.00
is movie 0.83
direct film 0.82
get for movie 0.81
get credit for film 0.79
direct animated film 0.79
make language films 0.78
make movies 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(director, be important to film industry)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(director, is movie)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(director, direct film)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(director, direct film)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(director, is movie)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(director, is movie)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(director, direct film)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(director, get for movie)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(director, get credit for film)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(director, get for movie)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(director, get credit for film)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(director, get for movie)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(director, make movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(director, get credit for film)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(director, make movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(director, make movies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(director, is movie)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(director, make movies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(director, get for movie)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(director, get credit for film)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(director, direct film)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(director, be important to film industry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(director, be important to film industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(director, be important to film industry)