director: wear headphones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents executive
Weight: 0.77
, officer
Weight: 0.69
, supervisor
Weight: 0.69
, police officer
Weight: 0.67
Siblings president
Weight: 0.69
, secretary
Weight: 0.67
, producer
Weight: 0.63
, lee
Weight: 0.54
, harold pinter
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear headphones 1.00
wear hat 0.78
wear hats 0.77
wear scarves 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(director, wear headphones)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear hats)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear hats)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(director, wear headphones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(director, wear headphones)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(director, wear hat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(director, wear hats)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(director, wear scarves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(director, wear hat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(director, wear hat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(director, wear hats)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(director, wear hats)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(director, wear scarves)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(director, wear scarves)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(director, wear scarves)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(director, wear hats)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(director, wear hat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(director, wear headphones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(director, wear headphones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(director, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)