dirt: be bad for lakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debris
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, hazard
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.57
, title
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mud
Weight: 0.35
, sand
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.33
, grease
Weight: 0.33
, silt
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for lakes 1.00
be bad for rivers creeks 0.86
be bad for animals 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(dirt, be bad for lakes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(dirt, be bad for lakes)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(dirt, be bad for lakes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dirt, be bad for rivers creeks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(dirt, be bad for lakes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(dirt, be bad for rivers creeks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(dirt, be bad for lakes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(dirt, be bad for animals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(dirt, be bad for lakes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(dirt, be bad for rivers creeks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(dirt, be bad for lakes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dirt, be bad for rivers creeks)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(dirt, be bad for lakes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(dirt, be bad for animals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(dirt, be bad for lakes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(dirt, be bad for animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(dirt, be bad for lakes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dirt, be bad for animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(dirt, be bad for lakes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dirt, be bad for lakes)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(dirt, be bad for lakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(dirt, be bad for lakes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dirt, be bad for lakes)