discipline: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virtue
Weight: 0.66
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, rule
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.61
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ethic
Weight: 0.69
, creativity
Weight: 0.66
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, patience
Weight: 0.62
, academic
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is good quality 0.98
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
is important quality 0.90
be good 0.86
has quality system 0.84
has quality honesty 0.79
be better than quantity 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(virtue, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(virtue, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(virtue, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(virtue, be good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aspect, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(virtue, be good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(virtue, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(creativity, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quality, be better than quantity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(patience, is good quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is good quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(patience, is important quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(patience, is quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(patience, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(creativity, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, is quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(virtue, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(virtue, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(creativity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(creativity, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(patience, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(patience, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(academic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(academic, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(creativity, is good quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(creativity, is good quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(creativity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(creativity, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(patience, is good quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(patience, is good quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(creativity, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(creativity, is quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(patience, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(patience, is quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(patience, is important quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(patience, is important quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(creativity, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(creativity, be good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(academic, has quality honesty)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(discipline, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(discipline, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(virtue, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(virtue, be good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(creativity, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creativity, is quality)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(creativity, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(patience, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(creativity, is good quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(patience, is quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(creativity, be good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(academic, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(patience, is good quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(patience, is important quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(academic, has quality honesty)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(virtue, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(virtue, be good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)