discovery: be at lake mungo historically significant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents development
Weight: 0.62
, finding
Weight: 0.61
, ship
Weight: 0.60
, achievement
Weight: 0.59
Siblings penicillin
Weight: 0.66
, acquisition
Weight: 0.32
, cargo ship
Weight: 0.31
, patent
Weight: 0.31
, cruise ship
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at lake mungo historically significant 1.00
be at lake mungo significant 0.92
be at lake mungo 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(discovery, be at lake mungo significant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(discovery, be at lake mungo significant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(discovery, be at lake mungo)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(discovery, be at lake mungo)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(discovery, be at lake mungo significant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(discovery, be at lake mungo)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(discovery, be at lake mungo)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(discovery, be at lake mungo significant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(discovery, be at lake mungo historically significant)