discussion: at same time as lecture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dialogue
Weight: 0.66
, agenda
Weight: 0.63
, community
Weight: 0.63
, plan
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
Siblings forum
Weight: 0.67
, lecture
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.34
, meeting
Weight: 0.34
, seminar
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
at same time as lecture 1.00
at time as lecture 0.98
be vs lecture 0.89
at same time 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(seminar, be vs lecture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(seminar, be vs lecture)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(seminar, be vs lecture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(discussion, at same time as lecture)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(discussion, at time as lecture)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(discussion, at time as lecture)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(discussion, at time as lecture)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(discussion, at time as lecture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(discussion, at same time)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(discussion, at same time)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(discussion, at same time)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(discussion, at same time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(discussion, at same time as lecture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(discussion, at same time as lecture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(discussion, at same time as lecture)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(seminar, be vs lecture)