dish: be bad company work for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.60
, utensil
Weight: 0.58
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.78
, potato salad
Weight: 0.76
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.75
, steak
Weight: 0.74
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad company work for 1.00
be bad company work 0.99
be worst company work for 0.88
be worst company work 0.87
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(utensil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work for)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(utensil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(dish, be bad company work for)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(dish, be bad company work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dish, be bad company work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dish, be bad company work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(dish, be worst company work for)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dish, be worst company work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(dish, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dish, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(dish, be worst company work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(dish, be worst company work for)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(dish, be worst company work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(dish, be worst company work for)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(dish, be worst company work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(dish, be worst company work for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality bad)