dishonesty: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, act
Weight: 0.55
, sin
Weight: 0.55
Siblings honesty
Weight: 0.35
, laziness
Weight: 0.35
, selfishness
Weight: 0.34
, stupidity
Weight: 0.34
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(dishonesty, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sin, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(dishonesty, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(sin, has quality wrong)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(honesty, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hypocrisy, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sin, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(laziness, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(honesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(honesty, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hypocrisy, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hypocrisy, has quality wrong)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(dishonesty, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(dishonesty, has quality definition)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(dishonesty, has quality definition)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality definition)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(dishonesty, has quality definition)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dishonesty, has quality wrong)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(dishonesty, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(dishonesty, has quality wrong)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(dishonesty, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sin, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(honesty, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(hypocrisy, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sin, has quality wrong)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)