dislocation: has consistency density

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.67
, complication
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.55
, theme
Weight: 0.50
Siblings fracture
Weight: 0.35
, swelling
Weight: 0.35
, paralysis
Weight: 0.34
, whiplash
Weight: 0.34
, rupture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has consistency density 1.00
density 0.86
has quality good 0.77
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(theme, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(dislocation, has consistency density)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(theme, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(theme, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(whiplash, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(theme, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(dislocation, has consistency density)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(paralysis, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(whiplash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(whiplash, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(swelling, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(swelling, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(dislocation, has consistency density)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(dislocation, density)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(dislocation, density)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, density)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(dislocation, density)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(dislocation, has consistency density)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theme, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(paralysis, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(whiplash, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(swelling, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theme, has quality better)