disneyland: was built in paris

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amusement park
Weight: 0.68
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, vacation
Weight: 0.62
, site
Weight: 0.61
, los angeles
Weight: 0.59
Siblings walt disney world
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, san jose
Weight: 0.34
, san diego
Weight: 0.34
, san francisco
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was built in paris 1.00
be in paris 0.92
be located in paris 0.91
paris hotel 0.85
was built 0.77
is built 0.76
was built in place 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(amusement park, is built)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(disneyland, was built in paris)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(amusement park, is built)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is built)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in place)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(san jose, was built)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was built)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(amusement park, is built)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(disneyland, was built in paris)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(san francisco, was built)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(san francisco, was built)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(san jose, was built)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(san jose, was built)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(san diego, was built in place)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(san diego, was built in place)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(disneyland, was built in paris)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(disneyland, be located in paris)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(disneyland, be in paris)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(disneyland, be in paris)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(disneyland, be located in paris)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(disneyland, be located in paris)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(disneyland, be in paris)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, be located in paris)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, was built)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(disneyland, paris hotel)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, be in paris)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(disneyland, was built)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(disneyland, paris hotel)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(disneyland, paris hotel)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(disneyland, was built)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(disneyland, was built)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, paris hotel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, was built in paris)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(disneyland, was built in paris)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amusement park, is built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(san francisco, was built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(san jose, was built)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in place)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(disneyland, was built in paris)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amusement park, is built)