display: have terrible latency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents exhibit
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.63
, field
Weight: 0.62
, signal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings exhibition
Weight: 0.64
, performance
Weight: 0.63
, screen
Weight: 0.62
, touchscreen
Weight: 0.61
, crt
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
have terrible latency 1.00
have latency 0.97
has latency 0.96
require bandwidth 0.76
require more bandwidth 0.75
produce bandwidth 0.75
produce greater bandwidth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(signal, require more bandwidth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(display, have terrible latency)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(signal, produce greater bandwidth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(display, have terrible latency)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(signal, produce bandwidth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(display, have terrible latency)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(signal, produce bandwidth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(signal, produce greater bandwidth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(signal, require more bandwidth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(signal, require more bandwidth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(signal, produce greater bandwidth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(signal, produce bandwidth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(signal, require more bandwidth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(display, have terrible latency)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(signal, produce greater bandwidth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(display, have terrible latency)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(signal, produce bandwidth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(display, have terrible latency)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(display, have terrible latency)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(display, have latency)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(display, have latency)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(display, have latency)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(display, have latency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(display, have terrible latency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(display, have terrible latency)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(signal, produce bandwidth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(signal, produce greater bandwidth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(signal, require more bandwidth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(signal, produce bandwidth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(signal, produce greater bandwidth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(display, have terrible latency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(signal, require more bandwidth)