display: is monitor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents exhibit
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.63
, field
Weight: 0.62
, signal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings exhibition
Weight: 0.64
, performance
Weight: 0.63
, screen
Weight: 0.62
, touchscreen
Weight: 0.61
, crt
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
is monitor 1.00
be called monitor 0.98
monitors work 0.88
be monitors recycled-2015 0.88
be with 4k monitor 0.84
be with 4k monitor at 52 hz 0.77
monitors flicker on film 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(crt, monitors flicker on film)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(crt, be monitors recycled-2015)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(crt, is monitor)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(crt, monitors work)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(screen, be called monitor)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(screen, monitors work)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(screen, is monitor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(screen, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(screen, is monitor)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(screen, be called monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(screen, be called monitor)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(crt, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(crt, is monitor)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(screen, monitors work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(screen, monitors work)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(crt, monitors work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(crt, monitors work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(crt, be monitors recycled-2015) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(crt, be monitors recycled-2015)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(crt, monitors flicker on film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(crt, monitors flicker on film)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(display, is monitor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(display, is monitor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(screen, is monitor)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(screen, be called monitor)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(screen, monitors work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(crt, is monitor)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(crt, be monitors recycled-2015)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crt, monitors flicker on film)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(display, is monitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crt, monitors work)