distillation: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.62
, operation
Weight: 0.60
, treatment
Weight: 0.52
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.36
, extraction
Weight: 0.34
, hydrolysis
Weight: 0.33
, refining
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
is quality 0.89
has quality change 0.86
be better than one 0.83
be better than simple 0.79
be much better than rush 0.77
be good for environment 0.77
be more important than product 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(distillation, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(distillation, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(operation, be much better than rush)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(distillation, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(distillation, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(process, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(process, be more important than product)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(operation, be much better than rush)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(operation, be much better than rush)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(process, be more important than product)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(refining, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(extraction, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extraction, be better than one)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(operation, be much better than rush)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(distillation, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(extraction, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(extraction, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extraction, be better than one)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(extraction, be better than one)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(refining, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(refining, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(combustion, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(distillation, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(distillation, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(distillation, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(distillation, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(distillation, be better than simple)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(distillation, be better than simple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(distillation, be better than simple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(distillation, be better than simple)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(distillation, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(process, be more important than product)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be much better than rush)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(extraction, be better than one)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality change)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(extraction, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(refining, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(process, be more important than product)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(distillation, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be much better than rush)