distribution: affect development east

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.66
, transfer
Weight: 0.62
, industry
Weight: 0.61
, quantity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings fedora
Weight: 0.51
, median
Weight: 0.50
, binomial
Weight: 0.50
, caldera
Weight: 0.42
, rollover
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect development east 1.00
affect development middle east 0.96
set up operations in northeast 0.78
was slow in south 0.77
be located in areas 0.77
be located in certain areas 0.76
be located in specific areas 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(industry, set up operations in northeast)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(distribution, affect development east)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(industry, be located in specific areas)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(distribution, affect development east)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(industry, be located in certain areas)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(distribution, affect development east)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(industry, was slow in south)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(distribution, affect development east)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(industry, was slow in south)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(industry, be located in certain areas)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(industry, be located in specific areas)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(industry, set up operations in northeast)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(industry, was slow in south)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(industry, set up operations in northeast)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(industry, be located in specific areas)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(industry, be located in certain areas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(industry, set up operations in northeast)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(distribution, affect development east)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(industry, be located in specific areas)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(distribution, affect development east)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(industry, be located in certain areas)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(distribution, affect development east)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(industry, was slow in south)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(distribution, affect development east)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(distribution, affect development east)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(distribution, affect development middle east)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(distribution, affect development middle east)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(distribution, affect development middle east)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(distribution, affect development middle east)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(distribution, affect development east)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(distribution, affect development east)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(industry, be located in certain areas)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(industry, be located in specific areas)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(industry, was slow in south)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(industry, set up operations in northeast)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(industry, be located in certain areas)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(industry, be located in specific areas)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(industry, was slow in south)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(distribution, affect development east)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(industry, set up operations in northeast)