distribution: be affected by issues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.66
, transfer
Weight: 0.62
, industry
Weight: 0.61
, quantity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings fedora
Weight: 0.51
, median
Weight: 0.50
, binomial
Weight: 0.50
, caldera
Weight: 0.42
, rollover
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be affected by issues 1.00
be affected by environmental issues 0.92
be affected 0.86
be affected by price changes 0.81
was affected after war 0.78
was affected by world war 1 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(industry, was affected by world war 1) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(distribution, be affected by issues)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(quantity, be affected by price changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(distribution, be affected by issues)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(quantity, be affected by price changes)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(industry, was affected by world war 1)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(industry, was affected by world war 1)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(quantity, be affected by price changes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(quantity, be affected by price changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(distribution, be affected by issues)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(industry, was affected by world war 1) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(distribution, be affected by issues)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(distribution, be affected by issues)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be affected by environmental issues)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be affected)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(distribution, be affected)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(distribution, be affected)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(distribution, be affected by environmental issues)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(distribution, be affected)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(distribution, be affected by environmental issues)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(distribution, be affected by environmental issues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be affected by issues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(distribution, be affected by issues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(quantity, be affected by price changes)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(industry, was affected by world war 1)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(quantity, be affected by price changes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(distribution, be affected by issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(industry, was affected by world war 1)