distributor: has quality price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.62
, warehouse
Weight: 0.61
, source
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.59
Siblings publisher
Weight: 0.59
, baker
Weight: 0.57
, software company
Weight: 0.35
, supplier
Weight: 0.35
, producer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality price 1.00
is pricing 0.82
has quality bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(distributor, has quality price)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(market, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(distributor, has quality price)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(market, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(market, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(software company, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(distributor, has quality price)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(market, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(distributor, has quality price)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(software company, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(software company, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(distributor, has quality price)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(distributor, is pricing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(distributor, is pricing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(distributor, is pricing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(distributor, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(distributor, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(distributor, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(distributor, is pricing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(distributor, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(market, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(software company, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(market, has quality bad)