distributor: is pricing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.62
, warehouse
Weight: 0.61
, source
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.59
Siblings publisher
Weight: 0.59
, baker
Weight: 0.57
, software company
Weight: 0.35
, supplier
Weight: 0.35
, producer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is pricing 1.00
has quality price 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(distributor, is pricing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(distributor, is pricing)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(distributor, is pricing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(distributor, is pricing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(distributor, has quality price)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(distributor, is pricing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(distributor, has quality price)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(distributor, is pricing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(distributor, has quality price)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(distributor, is pricing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(distributor, is pricing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(distributor, is pricing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(distributor, is pricing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(distributor, is pricing)