district: be in hunger games

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents school district
Weight: 0.84
, town
Weight: 0.72
, state
Weight: 0.68
, region
Weight: 0.62
Siblings high school
Weight: 0.71
, kolkata
Weight: 0.45
, galilee
Weight: 0.43
, karachi
Weight: 0.41
, lucknow
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in hunger games 1.00
participate in hunger games 0.93
was destroyed in hunger games 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(district, be in hunger games)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(district, be in hunger games)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(district, be in hunger games)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(district, was destroyed in hunger games)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(district, be in hunger games)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(district, was destroyed in hunger games)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(district, be in hunger games)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(district, was destroyed in hunger games)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(district, be in hunger games)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(district, was destroyed in hunger games)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(district, be in hunger games)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(district, participate in hunger games)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(district, be in hunger games)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(district, participate in hunger games)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(district, be in hunger games)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(district, participate in hunger games)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(district, be in hunger games)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(district, participate in hunger games)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(district, be in hunger games)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(district, be in hunger games)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(district, be in hunger games)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(district, be in hunger games)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(district, be in hunger games)