district: is different sizes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents school district
Weight: 0.84
, town
Weight: 0.72
, state
Weight: 0.68
, region
Weight: 0.62
Siblings high school
Weight: 0.71
, kolkata
Weight: 0.45
, galilee
Weight: 0.43
, karachi
Weight: 0.41
, lucknow
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is different sizes 1.00
have different sizes 0.99
is sizes 0.97
have sizes 0.97
vary in size 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(region, vary in size)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(district, is different sizes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(region, vary in size)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(region, vary in size)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(region, vary in size)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(district, is different sizes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(district, is different sizes)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(district, have different sizes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(district, have different sizes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(district, have sizes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(district, is sizes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(district, have sizes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(district, is sizes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(district, have different sizes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(district, have different sizes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(district, is sizes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(district, is sizes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(district, have sizes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(district, vary in size)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(district, vary in size)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(district, have sizes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(district, vary in size)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(district, vary in size)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(district, is different sizes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(district, is different sizes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(region, vary in size)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(district, is different sizes)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(region, vary in size)