diversity: be important in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.66
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.34
, pluralism
Weight: 0.34
, openness
Weight: 0.34
, integrity
Weight: 0.33
, harmony
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in canada 1.00
be good for america 0.79
be bad for america 0.78
be significant in america 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(diversity, be important in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(diversity, be bad for america)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(diversity, be bad for america)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be bad for america)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(diversity, be bad for america)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(diversity, be good for america)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(diversity, be good for america)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(diversity, be significant in america)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(diversity, be good for america)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(diversity, be significant in america)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(diversity, be significant in america)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for america)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be significant in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(diversity, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(diversity, be important in canada)