diversity: was important to people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.66
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.34
, pluralism
Weight: 0.34
, openness
Weight: 0.34
, integrity
Weight: 0.33
, harmony
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to people 1.00
be important in community 0.80
be important for society 0.78
be important in work place 0.78
be important in society 0.78
be important for today 's organizations 0.76
be important for business 0.76
be important in business 0.76
be important in white countries 0.75
be good in community 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(diversity, was important to people)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(diversity, was important to people)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(value, be important in society)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(diversity, was important to people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(value, be important in society)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(value, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(value, be important in society)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(value, be important in business)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(value, be important in society)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(diversity, was important to people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fairness, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fairness, be important in business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(integrity, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(integrity, be important for business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(integrity, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(integrity, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(diversity, was important to people)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important in community)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important in business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important for society)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important in society)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important for business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important for today 's organizations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good in community)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(diversity, be important in business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(diversity, be important in community)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(diversity, be good in community)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(diversity, be important in society)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(diversity, be important for society)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(diversity, be important for business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(diversity, be important for today 's organizations)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(diversity, be important in business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(diversity, be good in community)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(diversity, be important in society)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(diversity, be important in community)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(diversity, be important for society)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(diversity, be important for business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(diversity, be important for today 's organizations)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(diversity, be important in society)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(diversity, be good in community)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(diversity, be important in business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(diversity, be important in community)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(diversity, be important for society)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(diversity, be important for today 's organizations)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(diversity, be important for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(diversity, was important to people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(value, be important in society)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fairness, be important in business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(integrity, be important in business)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrity, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(value, be important in society)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(diversity, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important in business)