divorce: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents marriage
Weight: 0.68
, court case
Weight: 0.64
, trauma
Weight: 0.64
, death
Weight: 0.60
, situation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings marriage license
Weight: 0.36
, wedding
Weight: 0.34
, supreme court
Weight: 0.34
, bankruptcy
Weight: 0.33
, court
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is social problem 0.85
be social problem 0.85
be considered social problem 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(divorce, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(divorce, be social problem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(divorce, be social problem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(divorce, be social problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(divorce, is social problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(divorce, be considered social problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(divorce, be considered social problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(divorce, is social problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(divorce, is social problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(divorce, be considered social problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(divorce, be social problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(divorce, be considered social problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(divorce, is social problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(divorce, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(divorce, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(divorce, has state problem)