docking: is done

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents maneuver
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.54
, operation
Weight: 0.53
, activity
Weight: 0.50
, method
Weight: 0.47
Siblings landing
Weight: 0.35
, cargo ship
Weight: 0.31
, loading
Weight: 0.31
, takeoff
Weight: 0.31
, operating system
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is done 1.00
be done stomach 0.80
go work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(operation, be done stomach)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(docking, is done)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(docking, is done)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(operation, be done stomach)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(docking, is done)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(operation, be done stomach)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(docking, is done)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(landing, go work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(operation, be done stomach)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(docking, is done)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(docking, is done)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(docking, is done)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(landing, go work)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(landing, go work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(docking, is done)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(docking, is done)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(docking, is done)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(docking, is done)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(docking, is done)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(docking, is done)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(docking, is done)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(docking, is done)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(operation, be done stomach)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(docking, is done)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(landing, go work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(docking, is done)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(operation, be done stomach)