doctor: be very smart

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents emergency
Weight: 0.65
, family member
Weight: 0.65
, psychiatrist
Weight: 0.64
, tv show
Weight: 0.63
Siblings medical doctor
Weight: 0.80
, physician
Weight: 0.72
, psychologist
Weight: 0.68
, clinic
Weight: 0.67
, pharmacist
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be very smart 1.00
be pay very well 0.78
be very well pay 0.78
be used to make you feel good 0.77
be very skilled 0.77
be suppose to make person feel good 0.76
you good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(medical doctor, be pay very well)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(medical doctor, be pay very well)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(medical doctor, be pay very well)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(doctor, be very smart)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(doctor, you good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(doctor, be very well pay)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(doctor, be very well pay)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(doctor, be very well pay)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(doctor, be very well pay)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(doctor, you good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(doctor, you good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(doctor, you good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(doctor, be very smart)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(doctor, be very smart)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(doctor, be very smart)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(medical doctor, be pay very well)