dodge: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents make
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, company
Weight: 0.54
, truck
Weight: 0.53
Siblings escape
Weight: 0.32
, hop
Weight: 0.32
, shield
Weight: 0.31
, remember
Weight: 0.31
, stick
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worth 0.85
is great 0.81
have bad reputation 0.77
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(make, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(dodge, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(make, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(make, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hop, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(make, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dodge, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(shield, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(shield, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(shield, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(shield, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hop, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hop, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(dodge, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dodge, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(dodge, has quality worth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dodge, has quality worth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(dodge, has quality worth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dodge, have bad reputation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(dodge, is great)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dodge, has quality worth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dodge, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(dodge, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dodge, is best)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dodge, have bad reputation)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(dodge, is great)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(dodge, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(dodge, is great)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(dodge, have bad reputation)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(dodge, is best)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(dodge, have bad reputation)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dodge, is best)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(dodge, is great)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(dodge, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(dodge, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(make, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shield, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(shield, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hop, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(dodge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(make, has quality bad)