doe: be harassing sexual partner

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.51
, issue
Weight: 0.51
Siblings antler
Weight: 0.33
, elderly person
Weight: 0.32
, homeless person
Weight: 0.32
, dead person
Weight: 0.32
, creature
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harassing sexual partner 1.00
be harassing partner 0.95
be harassing 0.90
be sexual partner 0.87
be sexual 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(doe, be harassing sexual partner)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(doe, be harassing partner)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(doe, be harassing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(doe, be sexual partner)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(doe, be harassing partner)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(doe, be sexual)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(doe, be harassing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(doe, be harassing partner)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(doe, be harassing partner)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(doe, be harassing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(doe, be sexual)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(doe, be sexual partner)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(doe, be harassing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(doe, be sexual partner)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(doe, be sexual)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(doe, be sexual partner)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(doe, be sexual)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(doe, be harassing sexual partner)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(doe, be harassing sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(doe, be harassing sexual partner)