dog food: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, item
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.65
Siblings dog
Weight: 0.42
, pet
Weight: 0.38
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality good 0.91
has quality better 0.89
has quality bad 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pet, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pet, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pet, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pet, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pet, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(prairie dog, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(dog food, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(dog food, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dog food, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(dog food, has quality better)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(dog food, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dog food, has quality better)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(dog food, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(dog food, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(dog food, has quality better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(dog food, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dog food, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dog food, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(dog food, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dog food, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dog food, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pet, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pet, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dog food, is quality)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(prairie dog, has quality bad)